Leader of Leeds City Council on support for nightclubs, austerity and the future of the city

With the second-largest population of any council in the country and a net revenue exceeding £600 million, James Lewis is one of the most important politicians that you might not have heard about.

In many ways, Leeds is a city on the up. It has the most diverse economy in the country, with the largest legal and financial centre in England outside of London. 

It’s the third largest manufacturing centre, and its thriving arts and culture scene and booming university sector have driven growth and brought hope to a city which was hit hard by the industrial decline of the late twentieth century.

It has the highest-paying jobs in the UK outside of London, with an average salary of £37,800 which beats out competition from Manchester, Cambridge and Bristol. 

Leeds Bradford Airport is the country’s fastest growing regional airport and over the next decade, the economy in the city region is forecast to grow by 21%.

But fundamental issues – a poor transport network, housing shortages and high rates of deprivation in the city centre – hold the city back. 

And like many other councils across the country, Leeds has faced budget pressures in recent years amid a perfect storm of inflation, spiralling social care costs and reduced funding from Westminster.

Earlier this week, councillors met to approve the budget for the next financial year with £65 million of reductions needed in council spending to balance the books.

To meet that shortfall, council tax is rising by 4.98% and savings will be made with cuts to services, job losses and building closures. Car parking charges will also be introduced at parks across the city.

I met James a few days after the budget had been approved at Nexus, an almost cathedral-like structure that houses a research and innovation hub at the University of Leeds, a gleaming example of what the city gets right.

A member of the Labour Party, James was first elected in 2003 to represent the south-east Leeds ward Barwick and Kippax before later becoming the councillor for Kippax and Methley. He was made the Deputy Leader of Leeds City Council just under a decade ago and in 2021 was elevated to the top job.

Photograph: Abdullah Ali/Unsplash

He lays the blame on the financial difficulties faced by his and other councils up and down the country squarely on “14 years of austerity” by Conservative government in Westminster. During this time, he says £2.7 billion of funding has been diverted away from the council.

“That means that we’re stretching the council tax further and further to cover the costs of services that used to be met by large government grants.” 

“We’re also facing huge pressures from inflation and the cost of living. The council has got a gas and electricity bill like everyone else and we’ve also got huge pressures in terms of the number of people needing social care, which is one of the council’s biggest areas of spending.”

He stresses that Leeds, unlike other local authorities, has managed to balance the budget and is not at an immediate risk of bankruptcy. The situation, however, remains serious and a nearly 5% rise in council tax will be a tough pill to swallow during a cost of living crisis.

He is hopeful that if Labour wins the next general election funding for local government will be “more sustainable and fairer” for the city.

“Rishi Sunak, when he was running to be the leader of the Conservatives, told the Tunbridge Wells Conservative Association that he wanted to take money out of Labour areas and put it in places like that.

“That’s not where we need to be in a city like Leeds where we’ve got increasing levels of poverty and a need for social care.”

There is no doubt that we need better transport in Leeds. We’re the largest city in Europe without a mass transit system

After a bid to become the European capital of culture was dashed after Brexit, Leeds decided to press ahead and host its own year-long event in 2023. 

The event, which was supported with significant investment from the council, was labelled a “damp squid” by Councillor Allan Lamb, the leader of the Conservative group in the council.

During a debate on the budget this week, he said the council executive “has taken no responsibility for the decisions they have made.”

“They haven’t owned up to the fact the £10 million they spent on a city of culture last year that no one knew was happening could have been spent on vital services that people depend on.”

James argues that the event, despite having only a third of the average spend of an official capital of culture event, lifted the profile of Leeds and brought joy to the city.

He insists its legacy will continue, most clearly in Hibiscus Rising, the exotic flower sculpture which was designed by the artist Yinka Shonibare and was unveiled on the south bank of Leeds city centre in one of the final acts of Leeds 2023.

In an otherwise downbeat budget, the proverbial rabbit was pulled from the hat with a surprise announcement that Leeds residents would no longer have to make the walk of shame to a bottle bank in order to recycle their glass. 

Instead, from this summer, it will now be possible to recycle glass from the kerbside with estimates suggesting that 10,000 tonnes of waste will be saved from landfill.

In a statement, a spokesperson for the Liberal Democrats in Leeds City Council welcomed the move but criticised the “dithering”.

“After years of reflecting our budget amendments […] Labour are finally accepting its a good idea. Think how much additional glass could have been recycled in the years they’ve dithered.”

James says the council has prioritised free garden waste collection over kerbside glass recycling but is “pleased that we’re getting to the point where people will be able to put bottles and jars in the green bin.”

Photograph: Hamza Inayat/Unsplash

Last month, the nightclub operator Rekom UK announced that Pryzm, the largest nightclub in Leeds, would permanently shut along with several other venues across the country.

Its boss Peter Marks said the closures were caused by increased operating costs and reduced revenue as students cut back on going out as the cost of living crisis squeezes their budgets.

There are other challenges facing the industry too. Young people are drinking less and looser licensing laws mean nightclubs are competing with pubs and bars which close later than ever before.

We’re also looking about how we can be more positive and do more positive things for Leeds

The sector supports thousands of jobs and is undoubtedly a reason why so many talented students and young professionals want to live in the city.

The loss of Przym was a particularly big moment but it was just the latest in a string of closures.

James says the council was supporting the late night economy by approving more outdoor seating licences (which were first introduced out of necessity during lockdown), working with the police and the community to improve safety at night and helping to organise big public events.

“We put the Rainbow Bridge over Lower Briggate a few years ago to really support the LGBT+ venues. Leeds has the largest free Pride event in the country […] we have Light Night and other events around the year like the Christmas market, which was a huge success for increasing the number of people coming into the city centre.”

On safety, he’s working with the Mayor of West Yorkshire Tracy Brabin and her Deputy Alison Lowe OBE on their agenda to reduce violence against women and girls.

Brabin funded research which last month found that inadequate access routes, poorly lit areas and male-dominated public spaces made most women and girls feel vulnerable in parks.

“It’s something that we take really seriously around getting more police on the street.”

“It is also something that we want to do more on. We look at new programmes and initiatives when they come along.”

It is this cooperation between leaders – “Team Leeds” as he describes it – that James points to when asked what Leeds gets right.

“We work as a council with other public sector organisations, the police, the health service, the voluntary sector, businesses and try and come together and tackle the big issues we face in the city.

“We’re also looking about how we can be more positive and do more positive things for Leeds.

“I think there are areas we can do better. There is no doubt that we need better transport in Leeds. We’re the largest city in Europe without a mass transit system. We need to look at addressing that we need better train and bus services and that’s something hopefully in the years ahead, working with Tracy Brabin, we can bring about in Leeds.”

2023 Autumn Statement: what you need to know

On the 22nd of November, Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt presented the 2023 Autumn Statement explaining future plans for fiscal policy.

The main points from the speech were as follows:

  • The employee National Insurance contribution rate will be cut from 12% to 10% on the 6th January 2024. National insurance is a tax on earnings paid by employers and employees. Employees pay national insurance once their income exceeds the £12,750 threshold.
  • Hunt also confirmed that the National Living Wage will be raised from £10.42 an hour to £11.44 an hour. This applies to over 21s and will result in around £570 more per year for 5.5mil UK households. Before the autumn statement the NLW was applicable to over 23s but the age has been lowered.
  • In addition, the National Minimum Wage, which applies to under 18-20 year olds is increasing to £8.60 an hour.
  • The ‘full expensing’ tax break for businesses has been made permanent which will allow for businesses to invest more in machinery and technology. ‘Full expensing’ means purchases on equipment and upgrades by companies will be tax-free and is essentially a tax break for corporations
  • Universal credit will rise by 6.7%, this is a means-tested benefit available for low-income people. This raise is in line with inflation, meaning those on universal credit will not be more well-off after the increase,
  • However, alongside benefit increases the government is cracking down on claimants who they deem able to work but are claiming unemployment benefits.This will include tracking whether Universal Credit claimants have been attending job fairs and interviews and enforcing mandatory work placements for any recipients still unemployed after 18 months.
  • There is a freeze on raising alcohol duty, a tax levied on alcohol, until 1 August 2024.
  • The Office for Budget Responsibility has said there will be a £19 billion cut to public service spending in order to tackle waste.
  • All eligible working parents in England can access 30 hours of free childcare per week for 38 weeks per year from when their child is 9 months old, to when they start school.

Despite these changes, Hunt is operating in a context where the tax-burden is at a 70-year high. High taxes are resulting in increased discontent from Conservative backbenchers and media who see the party as the traditionally low-tax, less public spending party.

Hunt attempted to outline more positive news, opening saying that the economy has grown since the pandemic instead of falling into recession. 

He then stated that “we [the party], reduce debt, cut taxes and reward work. We deliver world-class education. We build domestic sustainable energy and we back British business with 110 growth measures”.

He reinforced this attempt at optimism saying that the economy is predicted to grow by 0.7% in 2024. However this is lower than the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR)’s 1.8% forecast.

In addition, inflation is expected to fall down to 2.8% by the end of 2024 which is still 0.8% above the Bank of England’s 2% target.


Labour Shadow Chancellor and MP for Leeds West, Rachel Reeves, responded on the Labour Party website:

“The Chancellor claims the economy has ‘turned a corner’, yet the truth is that under the Conservatives growth has hit a dead end.

What has been laid bare today is the full scale of the damage that this government has done to our economy over thirteen years.

And nothing that has been announced today will remotely compensate.”

Rachel Reeves

The autumn statement marks just another part of the Labour-Conservative fight to establish themselves as fiscally responsible ahead of the 2024 General Election.

New BBC impartiality rules: more of the same – or a fresh moderating touch?

At the end of September, the BBC enacted a new set of rules for the impartiality of their flagship presenters, with particular emphasis on how stars act on social media. 

Staff on big draws like Match of The Day, Antiques Roadshow and Strictly Come Dancing are now allowed to “express views on issues and policies” but must “stop short of political campaigning.”

What the BBC classifies as ‘political campaigning’ includes supporting/attacking a party during a set period where their show is on air, attacking individual politicians’ characters, or commenting on debates during elections. 


The head of the review, John Hardie, expressed the importance of striking a balance between freedom of speech and editorial impartiality, telling the BBC the new rules allowed presenters to “take a side” but ensuring that they “state the facts of the issue”.

The changes come hot on the heels of social media controversy swirling around the BBC. 

In March, Match of the Day presenter and former England striker Gary Lineker labelled the Conservative government’s asylum policy “similar to Germany in the 1930s.” He was subsequently suspended by the BBC. The company rescinded this after fellow Match of the Day presenters acted in solidarity and refused to work on that weeks’ episode. 

Lineker’s Tweet that led to the suspension / @GaryLineker on X

Former Editorial Policy Controller Richard Ayre weighed in on the new rules, saying the BBC were simply “kicking the can down the road” and compromising with the biggest names on their staff, with little real-world change.

He said that views aired by presenters were usually criticised by other parts of the media, not actually the public watching.

Ayre labelled the “big right-wing press” as the group most involved in the outcry over Lineker’s statements. He suggested that these corporate interests would distort the new initiatives to argue “that the BBC [is] not impartial”, and therefore should not receive public funding. 

Gary Lineker has stayed relatively quiet on the issue. He sought to moderate the debate, taking to X (formerly Twitter) to back the reforms as “very sensible.” 


Whether or not there is any concrete change to follow from the new rules is a question of time, but for the moment it seems that very little of substance has changed at the BBC.

Anti-Trade Union Laws Must Be Resisted

As strikes take place across the U.K., the Conservative Party is planning to introduce a wave of anti-union and anti-strike legislation. Continuing in Thatcher’s footsteps, the party remains committed to its ideological conflict with organised labour.

Rather than negotiating with trade unions, the Conservative strategy is to eschew negotiations in the hopes that prolonged industrial action will turn public sympathy against the strikes, and thus make it politically easier for anti-strike legislation to be brought forward in Parliament.

The government should be tackling the underlying causes of the strikes. Although the disputes are about a range of issues (job security, working conditions, etc.), pay disputes are common throughout. The government claims that public sector pay rises are not possible in the current economic climate. Yet, apparently, rising bankers’ bonuses and an increase in the wealth of the already wealthy are fine.

It must be recognised that it is not the working class that have caused the current economic problems. It is not the fault of cleaners, waking up in the early hours of a winter morning to clean a train station. It is not the fault of nurses, who worked tirelessly throughout the pandemic. It is not the fault of our postal workers, our teachers, our firefighters; it is not the fault of any part of the working class. The blame is squarely upon the government.Instead of touring morning television studios, ministers should be negotiating with trade unions, agreeing on pay settlements, guaranteeing job security and protecting workers’ terms and conditions. They should be using wealth taxes to fund investment into our public services and boosting recruitment numbers. Instead, they are devising plans to further weaken the organisational capacity of the working class by restricting union activity and the ability of working people to strike.

The right to strike must be defended. Contrary to Conservative arguments, industrial action is always a last resort. The Royal College of Nursing, for example, has not gone on strike in 106 years in England. Workers who strike also lose pay for every day that they withdraw their labour. Amidst a cost of living crisis, this is not an easy decision.

However, when the government is refusing to negotiate, or when employers continue to be obstructive, working people are left with no other choice but to withdraw their labour. Although disruptive, strikes are the final option taken by unions when all other options have failed. If people want the strikes to end, then they should direct their anger not at those on strike, but at the government and employers who have created the conditions leading to the strike.

The government is aiming to divide the working classes, so that anger is not directed at the government, but at other working people who take industrial action. Ultimately, this is self-destructive. It is the trade union movement that has won working people most of their rights. Governments do not simply grant rights out of goodwill; they must be fought for.

History illustrates this. A specific example is the right to equal pay, which was won by Ford workers in the 1960s who went on strike over gender discrimination. Other examples include the two-day weekend, paid maternity leave, retirement ages, health and safety standards, the minimum wage, paid holidays, workplace pensions, the eight-hour working day, and so much more.

To attack and undermine trade unions is also to attack workers’ rights and the achievements of generations of trade unionists. Fundamentally, every person should have the right to collectively organise and to withdraw their labour. It is through the collective organisation of workers that the working class can derive their political strength and defend their interests.

That is why all anti-trade union laws must be resisted. If such reforms are enacted, people’s right to collectively organise will be diminished. This will make it harder for workers’ interests to be advanced. Instead, workers’ rights will come under sustained attack from the Conservatives, and there will be minimal legal options to resist them. In a democratic society, people must have the right to organise politically to represent their interests. The interest of labour is represented through the labour movement. To restrict union activity is to restrict the right of the working classes to have their political and economic interests represented. Fundamentally, anti-union and anti-strike legislation is undemocratic, and it must be resisted.

Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons