Girls Don’t Be Shy, Aim High

Jessica Mount on 13 November 2021

Have you ever been told you that you are not good at something because of your sex? Or that it is ‘unusual’ that someone of your sex is doing your degree or has your hobbies? Most likely, you are a woman. 

Things like this can make us question ourselves and doubt our abilities, causing us to think twice about putting ourselves forward or aiming for the top. It’s easy to feel like you’re just pretending to know what you’re doing, waiting all the time for someone to come along and expose you; that you don’t actually deserve your accomplishments. You shouldn’t feel alone if you have these thoughts, as it is so common it has a name: imposter syndrome. It was first identified in 1978 by psychologists Pauline Rose Clance and Susanne Imes, in their paper identifying that women are more predominantly hit with this inability to internalise and own their successes. When you experience systematic oppression or grow up being directly or indirectly told that you are less than or undeserving of your achievements then imposter syndrome occurs. 

When you were in school, were you ever too shy to put your hand up in class or answer a question out of fear of being called out by one of the ‘class clown’ boys? We teach girls from a young age that it is cute to seem incompetent and have to ask for men’s help, whereas boys are taught that it is cool to throw their weight around and act like they know what they are doing. It’s simple, girls, we need to fake a little confidence too.

I don’t mean bullshit, just be confident. Don’t make things up or fake qualifications, just be a bit more assertive and positive about things. When it comes to careers, studies have shown that how confident we feel about our own abilities can have a major impact from entry level like the chances of actually applying for a job to how likely we are to ask for promotions. One study in particular by Hewlett Packard found that women only apply to jobs that they meet 100% of the requirements for, whereas men apply for those they only meet 60% of the requirements. In fact, one university advertised a job that was for females only and THIRTY men applied. 

You will always come across people that may criticise you and try to put you down, so you need to believe in your own talents and be kind to yourself. One main reason that girls don’t feel ‘qualified’ enough to take certain career routes is because they don’t hear about women doing those jobs. 

“We are more likely to experience imposter syndrome if we don’t see many examples of people who look like us or share our background who are clearly succeeding in our field” – Emily Hu.

This is why it is important to remember that not succeeding, for example at an interview, doesn’t mean you are a failure, you are just one step closer to where you are going. You just have to remember that there is no prize giving at the end, so you can ignore what everyone else is doing, nobody claims first prize!

Gendered Award Categories: Outdated or Unrepresentative?

Anushka Searle on 11 October 2019

Anushka Searle writes in response to the announcement that the “Brit Awards ‘will review’ male and female categories”

The Brit award categories ‘British female solo artist’ and ‘British male solo artist’ appear outdated, as they reference the sex of the individual consequently isolating protentional nominees of other gender identities. In the light of Sam Smith’s recent announcement, that they identify as non-binary, it seems that award categories will need to adjust accordingly. Though, an issue arises when we consider how this could affect another minority representation. If the categories (mentioned above) were combined to form the non-gendered category ‘British solo artist’, would this mean that fewer individuals are nominated, leading to many minority groups being underrepresented? One must consider that we don’t live in an ideal world and that the music industry, and the media in general, are polluted with racism, sexism, and homophobia. Therefore, the solution cannot be to decrease the representation of some to increase the representation of others. Award shows must adjust to modern identity, however, everyone must be equally represented and purely judged on their talent. Most artists, especially smaller artists, are overjoyed just to be nominated. Therefore, we can’t decrease the nominees of two categories into just one, as smaller, struggling artists will be overshadowed.

Even though eradicating gendered categories does seem to be the best solution to include those of every gender identity, as a woman I find all female categories empowering. It’s exciting to simply focus on female creatives, and to allow them the opportunity to not be overshadowed, and to win purely on talent. Though it was empowering to witness Emma Watson become the first recipient of the MTV Movie and Television Awards’ category ‘Best movie performance’-as it has recently become gender neutral- I can’t help but be sceptical. If they had given the award to a male actor after changing the category to be gender neutral then there would have been outrage in the media, however, because it was awarded to a woman the MTV Awards were applauded. This suggests in my view that award shows are tampered with in order to be politically correct, whether there is a “public” vote or not. Combined categories therefore seem more iniquitous than separate gendered categories.

In the past, gendered award categories have been targeted as being ‘archaic and unnecessary’. However, “non-binary” is new terminology that has just begun to enter vernacular and therefore, it is unfair to use the word ‘archaic’, as the world has only just begun to understand what non-binary entails. It is also unfair to suggest that gendered categories are ‘unnecessary’, when in fact they have been necessary in order to increase the representation and support of female creatives. In conclusion, award shows need to be more representative of everybody. However, one must make sure that equality is always considered, and that changes made to represent one social group don’t diminish another grouping in the process.

Header image credit: Pink News