Liberation Coordinators campaign to diversify products and food at LUU

To commemorate and celebrate Black History Month this year, Liberation Coordinators (a group of students appointed to represent and advocate for marginalised students at the University of Leeds) have launched a campaign to diversify the range of products and food available at the Union.

The goal of their campaign is to cater to the needs of Black students at the university and promote Black-owned businesses. This campaign includes products sold at the Co-op (food, drink haircare and self-care ) and its food outlets such as Terrace, Old Bar and Common Ground.

The Liberation Coordinators have created a survey asking Black students what food, drink, haircare and self-care products or bands they want to see stocked in the Co-op as well any dishes and recipes they want on the menu at LUU food outlets.

They hope to keep the survey open for the whole academic year with the product list being “non-exhaustive and continuously growing.”

This is to make sure that every Black student at Leeds is given the opportunity to have a say and the LUU knows there is a need for this.

Whilst the campaign is being launched during Black History Month, the Liberation coordinators are keen to ensure that this will be a yearlong campaign that results in permanent and sustainable change within the union.

Their goal is to ensure that Black students see themselves represented in the Union beyond Black History Month.

“The ultimate achievement would be that Black students feel that they can utilise what LUU has to offer, as much as other students that are currently available to. Potentially, it might also be the first stepping stone to diversifying the products range for other ethnically minoritised students too.” Explained Danielle, a Liberation Coordinator.

Regina emphasised that for her, this campaign was about: “normalising the Black culture that I found on campus, because you can’t ignore that there are Black students at Leeds.”

As a Black student herself, her role as a Liberation Coordinator especially in the wake of the Black Lives matter movement was a way for her to hold the university to account: “I feel like sometimes the university and the union go hard for Black History Month and forget about the rest of the year. We have to hold the university accountable to ensure that change is actually implemented.”

When asked where the idea for this campaign came about Danielle said:  “Leeds is one of the biggest student unions in the UK and as such, it should reflect all students that attend the university.”

This was mirrored by fellow Liberation Coordinators Lily: “White students can easily go into the Co-op and buy products that support their hair type. We saw that there were no products in the Co-op specifically for afro-textured hair. This didn’t make sense to us. How can the Union represent its Black members, if it is not selling products for its Black members specifically?”

How long will it take students to see the effects of the campaign in the LUU?

The Liberation coordinators made it clear that they are working hard to get products in the Co-op as quickly as possible and they want to make sure that they are affordable.  

Danielle added that the campaign has already started to bear fruit: “If you go to Old Bar now, we actually have a promotional BHM cocktail and mocktail called ‘Legacy Fusion.’ If you like cocktails – then definitely give it a try!”

She added that: “In terms of food being sold in outlets such as Old Bar, the effects of our campaign here should be relatively soon. We have been working with Jon, the manager, to create a menu that includes African-Caribbean foods.”

Here are what some students thought of the campaign:

Kingsley, president of Leeds Law society and former president of African-Caribbean society said: “I think this is a brilliant idea! Leeds has always prided itself on being diverse and this an excellent step in furthering that by demonstrating Inclusivity. I can see this becoming hit for students, as they won’t necessarily have to leave campus to find products that they need, which in turn will only lead to a more vibrant campus.”

An anonymous student added :“it seems like a good idea but if the changes are implemented e.g. the refractory starts selling more ‘Black foods’ there’s the danger the food isn’t nice, so  it would’ve been better if they never tried at all”

Abigail, social media manager for Black Feminist Society also raised an important question about whether this could potentially detract from supporting local Black-owned businesses and food outlets in Leeds: :  “I appreciate the important steps LUU are taking and think it is a great idea, however…unless the food they are getting is being provided by a Black-owned distributor I have no interest in spending money at the union for food that are predominantly sold and consumed by the Black community”

In response to concerns from students about wanting to continue supporting Black-owned businesses and food outlets already in Leeds,  Regina exclaimed that: “I am really pushing for the LUU to collaborate with Black businesses and vendors in Leeds because it will be good for both businesses. If the food isn’t nice then it’s going to put people off, so we have to collaborate with African-Caribbean food vendors. “

She also added that: “I have asked the LUU if they would consider hiring a Black chef and they responded saying that their chefs well trained, but they didn’t answer my question. I think this campaign will work if they are open about it.”

In response to the issues raised in this article, Laila, the LUU Equality and Diversity Officer said: “I have not been a part of those conversations; however, I appreciate you bringing them to my attention. If need be, I can talk the specific Liberation Coordinators involved and hear their concerns/opinions and see what I can do within my role, to help support their vision. “

The politics of Misogynoir: One of the many barriers which silence and erase black women in the public sphere

The abuse and hate hurled at black and dark-skinned women who dare to take a seat at the table and speak truth to power is tragically nothing new in politics. However, in the age of social media, twitter trolls and memes, this abuse plays out brutally in our digital spaces and manifests itself in the “real world”.

This form of misogyny has become so acute, that in 2008 the term misogynoir was coined by the academic Moya Bailey to give black women the vocabulary to talk about their experiences.  As researcher Lisa Amanda Palmer highlights, the term describes the gendered and sexualised form of racism faced by black women in popular culture and the current political landscape. However, misogynoir rears its head in all aspects of black women’s lives, having devastatingly tangible and violent consequences.

One extreme example of this was an incident that took place at end of August. A right-wing French magazine published a cartoon depicting a black member of parliament and outspoken afro-feminist activist Danièle Obono, as a slave in chains. This image was accompanied by an equally racist fictional narrative where she finds herself put up for auction in the 18th century. After seeing the images, I was left dumbfounded, asking myself how a magazine, which the French president once described as “very good” could publish an image of a black member of parliament, a human being, as a slave? Worst still, Obono is frequently met with an avalanche of abuse from her fellow politicians and members of the public alike for simply doing her job.

This is by no means a problem unique to the French. Misogynoir is rampant and deep-rooted within the UK political landscape too. This summer alone, I was distressed to read that the Labour MP and former Shadow Women’s and Equalities Minister Dawn Butler was forced to close her constituency office. This was after threats against her and her staff  “drastically escalated” following her defence of  Black Lives Matter protests and after speaking about the impact of COVID-19 on ethnic minorities.  Not only was this an attack on Dawn Butler, but an attack on democracy itself. In an open letter to her constituency, Butler frankly stated that the windows of her office had been smashed through by bricks and that she continues to:  “receive on an almost daily basis, threats of violence and death threats”.  Though, she went on to add defiantly that: “I will never be threatened into silence and will continue to speak out and speak up for all of my constituents in Brent Central”.

The labour antisemitism report leaked in April also painted a dark and depressing image of the endemic nature of anti-black racism and misogynoir within the labour party and politics more generally. For years I saw Labour as leading the fight against racism within mainstream politics, but no longer feel that way today. Racism and misogyny are not just confined to the ultra-right or the depths of twitter troll land but are present on all sides of the political spectrum. The dossier confirmed that; unearthing the vile treatment and bullying that black women were subject to by members of their own party.  Upon her appointment to the shadow cabinet, senior staff jokingly dismissed Dawn Butler’s serious allegations of racism as “untrue”. Similarly, the leaked document revealed how a senior staff member used  “a classic racist trope” to insult Diane Abbott; the first black woman to be elected to parliament and longest-serving black MP. Despite her popularity within her constituency, retaining her seat for over 30 years, a 2017 report revealed that Abbot receives more online abuse than any other MP. 

Perhaps, what these blatant attacks on a black woman painfully shows is just how commonplace the dehumanisation of black women has become.  These attacks usually rely upon racist and sexist tropes that portray black women as angry, undesirable, animalistic and ultimately undeserving of their humanity or your empathy. Despite attempts to silence these phenomenal women, they still continue to fight and stand up for what they believe in. They refuse to be invisible and refuse to be silent. In the words of Dianne Abbott: “the abuse and the attacks have never made me falter”. Yet the heavy burden of misogynoir should not be left upon the shoulders of black women to carry alone. We must struggle, collectively to rid it from our body politic. While I don’t have all the answers, what I do know is that we have to go beyond “diversity and inclusion” or unconscious bias training to achieve this. This can be summed up by author Lucy Ko’s tweet: “The revolution will not be diversity and inclusion trainings”. The presence of black women and other marginalised communities in parliament is vital to keeping our democracy alive and we must remove the barriers that stop them from getting there.