A review of Leeds International Festival of Ideas – Who does our political system benefit?

The Leeds International Festival of Ideas is in its third year running, and this year it has massively expanded in size: relocating to the Quarry Theatre in Leeds playhouse with a maximum of 850 Seats, and in its line-ups: from attracting the likes of former home secretary, Amber Rudd, to renown actor Christopher Eccleston. It is organised by the not-for-profit, Leeds BID, who work on development for the city centre and represent 648 businesses in Leeds.

I attended the discussion on “who does our political system benefit?” where a panel of recognisable faces discussed their perspectives on the question, and what could be done to improve UK Politics in relation to this question.

The panel was hosted by Lewis Goodall (replacing Jon Sopel), who helped find agreement between the panellists, and brought the debate from topics such as electoral systems to discussion over simultaneously growing apathy and disgust both with the system and individual politicians. Discussion was (as is now unfortunately rare in modern politics) respectful and thoughtful between panellists, and each had a unique perspective on issues raised, and possible solutions for these.

I was surprised that the figure emerging as a crowd favourite was Scarlett Westbrook – a 19-Year old climate justice advocate – whose more pessimistic stance on the state of politics appeared to resonate with the audience. Rounds of applause given at multiple points, including where Westbrook voiced disillusionment with the primary political parties, and when she commented on the cost of living crisis as being avoidable. This attitude was shown in particular when an audience member in the Q&A segment commented on panellists Amber Rudd and Tom Brake “assuming” that questions were directed at them, giving the first response to questions, and having spoken more than the other two panellists.

Magid Magid – former Lord-Mayor of Sheffield and Green Party MEP – voiced strong reservations both to the First Past the Post voting system, and the lack of cross-party dialogue. He focused both on structural weaknesses of the political system, and the worsening political culture – MPs increasingly treating their position not as a privilege, but as a right.

Tom Brake, who now serves as director of the pressure group, Unlock Democracy (formerly serving as a Liberal Democrat member of the coalition government) highlighted a number of representation problems, with the central message that unfit politicians, rather than democracy itself, were at fault for disillusionment with politics. He gave a number of policy proposals that Unlock Democracy were seeking to implement, including Citizens Assemblies, banning of second jobs for MPs, and lack of transparency or controls on donations to political entities.

Finally, Amber Rudd – former Home Secretary and Conservative MP – came out largely in support of the system: noting that it got rid of two Prime Ministers when they were unable to further serve the country, and stressing that during a period of political abnormality and instability, that our system had survived. Although she does not believe in reforming the voting system, as First Past the Post has produced a coalition and minority government of recent, at times when there was insufficient support for one party to form majority government. She did call for expansions to localism with more power to devolved bodies, and was applauded for defending MPs where they have to deal with abuse and threats.

While I was expecting the audience to be made up of mostly young people with particular interests in politics, the opposite would be the case – the majority were working-age to retired: teachers, architects, and retired people with no major interest in politics all made up the audience. One member I spoke to reflected the attitude shared amongst many – the exhaustion of the current state of affairs, and wish to see a reconnection between people and politicians. This intergenerational attitude of course explains Scarlett Westbrook’s popularity, and may worry former colleagues of panellists in parliament.

I did thoroughly enjoy the discussion – I think it certainly served its purpose of educating the public about the issues of the day, and where the solutions to these may lie. If I were to suggest improvements, I think the biggest weakness was the lack of disagreement: as areas where the panellists did not have consensus could be better explored. Equally, while the panel was impressive, the lack of a Labour Party oriented member does mean a large section of current political debate was absent.

But overall, the panel discussion was a popular success – providing a note of hope for an improved political system. This event follows a growing trend of public interest in politics outside of the two party structure, showing us that while the parties may be losing unconditional support from some members, that public interest in politics is not wavering as a result.

What is the consensus on scrapping HS2?

In the Conservative conference in Manchester Rishi Sunak officially announced cancelling the rest of the HS2 project. He now promises to reinvest “every single penny” into new transport projects in the North and in the Midlands that will make a “real” difference. 

This multi-billion high speed rail route was meant to bridge together the north-south divide, connecting northern cities like Leeds to the economic centre, London.

Sunak has now announced that everything beyond Birmingham will now be cancelled, even though it is already under construction. The project will now create £36bn worth of savings which will be switched to more spending on local transport based projects under the Network North scheme.

His words were “the facts have changed, and the right thing to do when the facts change, is to have the courage to change direction”. He has now vowed to create a “Midlands rail hub” that will connect 50 different stations, including building a tram system in Leeds along with upgrading a series of major roads and extending the West Midlands metro.

The High Speed Rail Group criticised Sunak saying he has caused the “biggest and most damaging U-turn in the history of UK infrastructure”. Scrapping a 14 year project that has been plagued by delays and cost overruns cannot just be done because “we’ve changed our mind”. 

A key question would be, what has been the reaction of the North to Sunak’s decision? Collectively, the newly announced smaller transport projects could positively affect a wider area and benefit people in smaller northern towns. Such as Sunak pledging a £2.5billion investment in a new tram system for Leeds alongside a number of other schemes in Yorkshire.

Tees Valley Conservative major, Ben Houchen said “good riddance” to the cancellation of the project as he believed it would offer ”absolutely no benefit” to wider regions in the North. 

Alternatively, towns such as Crewe in East Cheshire that were promised so much now worry about its future. Mrs Mellor says that “the railway was what kept the town running”. The hopes of brighter opportunities for jobs for younger generations has now been left forgotten. Conservative MP of Crewe spoke of his “extreme disappointment” as the HS2 project would have transformed their local economy.

Ultimately, whilst the government has proposed new and exciting plans they have continually been accused of ‘broken promises’ and could be seen to have a lack of trust with its voters. So will these new projects actually happen? After the scrapping of the eastern leg from Birmingham to Leeds in 2021, who is to say we may not have a similar circumstance.

The northern population needs reassurance that transport schemes will take place to improve their connectivity and standard of living in the most beneficial way.

If these projects fall under it will have a substantial impact on the way people vote and view the government from the North.

Is Network North levelling up in action or more Tory distraction?

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has announced a brand new transport scheme for the North of England, known as Network North. The announcement was made on Wednesday 4th at the Conservative Party Conference in Manchester, and follows the cancellation of the Northern leg of HS2, intended to connect Birmingham and Manchester with high-speed rail.

The Leeds line was scrapped back in November 2021.


The purpose of HS2, as part of the wider Levelling Up scheme across the UK, was to create more opportunity in cities outside of London and boost regional productivity. Furthermore, many hoped that such a large infrastructure project would reinvigorate the stagnant UK economy; more than 30,000 jobs have already been provided by HS2. Speaking to The Civil Engineer, the Civil Engineering Contractors’ Association (CECA) stated that “without commitment to fast tracking [the Network North projects] and getting boots on the ground in the immediate future, they will have little impact on the UK’s economic recovery and future prosperity.”

In an official statement on the Government website, Sunak claims that “every penny” of the £36 billion intended for HS2 will be reinvested into the Midlands and the North, providing for a new programme of transport improvements that will benefit “far more people, in far more places, far quicker.”

Of that total, £19.8 billion has been pledged specifically to the North, “on things like connecting its major cities”, according to Sunak. Railways connecting Leeds to cities like Hull and Sheffield are also set to be upgraded, reducing travel times.

The most notable feature for Leeds residents is the new “fully funded £2.5 billion West Yorkshire mass-transit system, giving the region better connections to Bradford and Wakefield” that has been proposed.

Leeds is renowned for being the largest major city in Western Europe without any kind of mass public transport network.

There have been ongoing plans for a West Yorkshire transit system for some years, part of West Yorkshire Mayor Tracy Brabin’s “plans for West Yorkshire to become a net-zero carbon economy by 2038”, reports the Yorkshire Evening Post.

Plans for a Leeds-based tram system were originally proposed in 1991, more than three decades ago. The Leeds Supertram, a second iteration, gained provisional government approval in 2001, before being scrapped in 2005 due to concerns over rising costs.

The Proposed 2005 tram route

Brabin herself described the scrapping of the Northern leg as “yet another betrayal of the North” in an official statement posted on X, formerly known as Twitter. In an interview with Channel 4, she voiced doubts about the proposed Leeds transit system, highlighting that there are, as yet, “no timeframes for the money” and citing previous Government rollbacks: “we’ve been promised so much by Conservative government [that has]… been pulled”, referencing the Northern Powerhouse Rail scheme.

Northern Powerhouse Rail, sometimes nicknamed HS3, was proposed in 2014 and was intended to connect Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds by high speed rail. However, the project was significantly watered down in 2021 under Boris Johnson.

Brabin’s reservations gained credence after the Government withdrew its commitment to reopening the disused Leamside railway line in the North-East just 24 hours after the announcement. The reopening of the Leamside line was one of the Government’s “key transport pledges”, according to LBC.

Asked about the proposed Network North projects, Secretary-General of the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT) Mick Lynch said this in an interview with PoliticsJOE, at the Labour Party Conference on Sunday 8th: “I don’t think any of that’s going to happen. [The Government] didn’t even consult Network Rail about how it’s going to work. They’re now saying that all the money is not there.”

As of yet, the Government has not announced when these projects will be initiated, or when the funds will be delivered to their respective regions.

The question, then, is whether Network North is a genuine, long-term scheme to bring efficiency and prosperity to a Northern transport system that has been neglected for decades, or, as Mayor Brabin puts it, “pure electioneering” for a Conservative party struggling in the polls with a general election looming on the horizon.

Cheer: How the Leeds Celtics are setting the pace for gender equality across campus

Established in 2001, and today comprising of 6 different teams, both co-ed and all-women’s, Leeds Celtics Cheerleading are fast becoming one of the most popular sports societies on campus. With both national and grand-national titles to their name, the Celtics compete across multiple levels of difficulty, with teams tailored to a variety of abilities and skill sets. Cheerleading provides a unique opportunity to support and work alongside other sports societies. Cheer attendance at games not only boosts spectator spirit, but also player morale, fostering a culture of partnership and community. Traditionally, the cheerleading team have primarily attended men’s games, but this year, the society are working to change that, by cheering for a wider variety of sports, with a particular focus on supporting women’s teams.

With this in mind, I sat down with Celtics Captain Holly Rattigan, and Match Secretary Lilly Mansfield, to discuss how the society is using their central position to promote women’s sport across campus.

Speaking first about what encouraged them to begin cheer, both Holly and Lilly discussed their desire to try something new at university. With over 160 members, Celtics is a great way to meet new people and make friends outside of your course, whilst keeping fit and learning new skills.

“We’re a huge society…and it’s like one big family.” (Holly)

Many people haven’t tried cheer before, and transfer from dance or gymnastics backgrounds. It’s a sport which requires discipline, strength, and rhythm, with the Celtics training extensively before attending any fixtures.

‘At what point did you begin to notice a gap in the sports that cheerleaders were directed to cheer for?’

“Immediately… ‘[Whilst] we did cheer for women’s sports sometimes… it wasn’t the focus” (Lilly).

The Celtics have been a society for a long time, and naturally, relationships with other sports have developed, leading to traditions and long-established partnerships. In light of this history, the Celtics already had many teams they wanted to cheer for in the upcoming semester, however, there was a noticeable gap in cheer representation at women’s games. Captain of the Celtics, Holly, attributes this to the stereotypical perception of cheerleaders, which has emerged from US cheer culture, “The traditional view of side-line cheerleaders in America was girls with pompoms cheering on men’s games…but it’s something we really want to push against.”

With the new academic year commencing, the Celtics have set out to change tradition and challenge cheer stereotypes, all the while supporting other women’s sports societies.

‘What steps are you taking to ensure women’s sports are receiving the same support from the Celtics?’

“As soon as I became Match Sec, I said I wanted to cheer for women’s sports” (Lilly).

As Match Secretary, Lilly oversees the booking of the cheer team’s fixtures, and it was upon starting the position that she began to notice a lack of cheer presence at women’s matches. She raised the issue with the coaches and committee, and everyone was onboard with extending the scope of the Celtics’ game attendance.

“We loved the idea of girls supporting girls, and the female led societies at the Uni are amazing, so we thought it would be great if we could cheer for them as well … they appreciate the work that has been done to get cheer and other women’s sports the platform, participation and support they have now.” (Holly)

Following these internal discussions, Lilly contacted a variety of on campus women’s sports teams, each of whom were thrilled to receive cheer support at their games and begin creating a relationship with the Celtics.

Alongside match presence, a huge part of building cross-society connections comes from socials. Cheer have always enjoyed collaborative socials with other sports, however, “every time we did a joint social with another society, it was only the men’s [teams](Holly).

Conversations have already begun, and dates saved to change this, with the upcoming Celtics season full of socials and appearances at both men’s and women’s games, and for a wider range of sports than ever before, “we’ve got a really nice broad, even split.” (Lilly)

Whilst there is a plethora of benefits to connecting with more societies and teams, at the heart of this move for change was a desire to see women supporting women.

Women’s sport has always faced adversity. Whether it’s through lack of funding, support, or resources, female athletes have all shared in the struggle of gaining equal recognition and respect. By using their platform to promote women’s sports too, the Celtics hope to tackle harmful prejudices, and give female athletes the equal celebration and support they deserve.

“We…love the idea of pushing back against the misogynistic undertones and stereotypes that often come to people’s mind[s] when they think of side line cheer, and we prioritise the girls wanting to support, uplift and encourage other female societies, and hope that this can go some way to change people’s perceptions.” (Holly)

The Celtics have an exciting year ahead, with requests to cheer from the Leeds Gryphons Women’s Ice Hockey team, who have made it into the premiership, and Leeds’s very own professional rugby club, the Leeds Rhinos.

The changes the Celtics are making set the standard for gender equality across campus, and challenge historic gender stereotypes which threaten to limit and undervalue women’s sport.

Leeds Bradford Airport: plane veers off runway whilst landing – all fights suspended

A TUI plane arriving from Corfu skid off the runway during a landing at Leeds Bradford Airport this afternoon (Friday, October 20th).

The aircraft arrived amid Storm Babet, with conditions of heavy rain and strong winds forcing it off the runway.

A spokesperson at the airport said, “We can confirm TUI flight TOM3551 arriving from Corfu at LBA this afternoon has moved off the runway while landing”.

The incident happened at around 13:50 with an aircraft capacity of 189 passengers.

The flight is now at a standstill on ‘boggy grassland’ leaving nearly two hundred passengers stranded.

A large emergency response has been undertaken with the attendance of West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue as well as the Yorkshire Ambulance Services’ Hazardous Area Response Team.

In a statement, West Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service said: “At this time, there are no reported injuries or fires” and that “remaining crews are now assisting in evacuating all persons from the aircraft to the terminal”.

Air traffic control has closed the runway after the incident after Yorkshire was hit by Storm Babet. With flights halted or diverted to other airports including Manchester.

TUI released a statement, saying “We are aware of an incident at Leeds Bradford Airport this afternoon, in which upon landing flight TOM2551 slightly veered off while turning into the taxiway”. Commenting that “there are no reported injuries, and our ground team are on hand to support passengers”.

Passengers have raised concern on social media, commenting on the incident.

Malcolm Fell wrote on Facebook posting photos from his passenger window, captioning: “Oops overshot runway at Leeds Bradford airport […] interesting landing greeted by fire engines and airport authorities […] going to be here for a while”.

Another passenger posted on X that “no one was hurt and everyone is fine”.

Fiona Marr witnessed the event from within the airport. She described it as a “hard landing.”

“Straight away there was a really loud alarm coming from the airport which I’ve not heard before”.