Theatre Review: Handel’s Giulio Cesare in Egitto by Opera North.

Emma Rivers reviews the dazzling Giulio Cesare in Egitto by Opera North at the Leeds Grand Theatre.


George Handel’s Giulio Cesare in Egitto (Julius Caesar in Egypt), is an Italian opera first performed in 1724 in London. This opera intertwines themes of political ambition, dangerous love, and survival, all set to an innovative baroque orchestral score. Set in Egypt after the Roman Civil War, the production opens with Tolomeo, the dangerously sadistic ruler of Egypt, murdering Caesar’s rival Pompeo. When Caesar arrives in Egypt to confront Tolomeo, Cleopatra senses an opportunity to overthrow her brother and take the throne for herself by seducing the Roman Emperor. 

Director Tim Albery’s revival of Giulio Cesare, first performed by Opera North in 2012, presents us with a stunning combination of set design, costume and lighting. These aspects work together to blend the traditional and modern, sweeping the audience along with the timeless, character-driven story. 

The set design is striking in its simplicity. When the curtain first lifts the audience is presented with an overbearing edifice of stark grey concrete. The blasted, bullet-pocked structure conjures up thoughts of a war-torn bunker and serves as a perfect introduction for the militaristic Caesar. However, as the story progresses the two-piece set unfolds like a jewellery box, revealing a stunning golden interior that serves as the setting for the intimate Egyptian scenes. Likewise, the lighting created by Thomas Hase is cleverly used to contrast the two opposing cultures of the Romans and Egyptians. Caesar’s scenes feature a harsh white light shining from above severely on to the concrete set. In contrast, the Egyptian scenes have warm low-level candlelight glowing upon the characters, creating an intimate and rich scene against the gold backdrop of the pyramid set. Both lighting and set work to further emphasise the cultural and political divide between the two societies, creating a tangible tension across the stage.

Albery’s influence is further demonstrated through the choice to cast the roles of Caesar and Sesto to women. While these roles could have been cast as countertenors (high male voice), Albery chose to maintain the spirit of the original production’s use of Castrati (yes, that means what you think) while updating it to the modern era by casting contralto Maria Sanner (Caesar), and mezzo-soprano Heather Lowe (Sesto) in traditionally male roles. Both Sanner and Lowe give exceptional performances, Sanner has a commanding and strong presence on stage, and Lowe powerfully portrays the pain and emotion of Sesto throughout the opera.  

The only criticism to put forward of this brilliant production is that, despite the story featuring Egyptian and Roman characters, there are no people of colour in the cast. This inclusion of diversity would have added depth and realism to an otherwise flawless production.

Whether you’re an opera newbie or seasoned veteran, there’s something for everyone in this production. If you’re tempted to explore the world of Caesar and Cleopatra for yourself, Opera North runs an Under 30s Scheme where you can gain access to great tickets for only ten pounds.

Image Credit: Opera North

Music as an Act of Resistance

With the shortlist for this year’s Mercury Music Prize being more politicised than ever, Toni Stephenson takes a look at how politics and music have become increasingly intertwined over recent years.

Since the shortlisted twelve albums for this year’s Mercury Music Prize were announced in the summer, critics and commentators alike have been hailing the 2019 finalists as the most political in the prestigious award’s 27 year history. Previous recipients of the award for best album released in the United Kingdom by a British or Irish act have been rather apolitical; artists often opted for themes of love, religion and emotion to inspire their song writing. https://www.youtube.com/embed/V1e0ZG0zRCo?feature=oembed

This year, however, the themes in each album are much more explicit and relevant to current affairs. The awards evening saw rapper Dave take home the prize for his album Psychodrama which explores the tough socio-political conditions faced by today’s British black communities. Other nominations included Anna Calvi’s Hunter which explores gender roles, Foals’ Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost which tackles the climate crisis and mental health and Little Simz’s Grey Area which touches on attitudes to female success. So is it true that popular music has become more politicised over the last few years? 

There is no doubt that political frustration is at an all-time high for many of our lifetimes. We appear to be living in a period of Brexit purgatory and increasing populism. Political discourse seems increasingly divisive and whether musicians and artists are using their music to tackle this head on or to satirically vent their frustrations, the politics of race, class, identity and climate have definitely infiltrated their way into this year’s top albums. Whilst last year’s winners, Wolf Alice, were recognised for their soft indie melodies and mix of angelic and heavy vocals, this year’s entire shortlist appears to make a statement of protest.

Of course, music has always had a close relationship with politics. Entire genres such as hip-hop, jazz and blues have developed from repressive socio-economic and political situations. The punk movement was born in the 1970s out of anti-authoritarianism and full rejection of conservative values. Blues developed as a movement in the US as a result of the harsh oppression and segregation imposed upon African-American communities. So there is most certainly a correlation between turbulent, repressive political atmospheres and the creation of protest music.

The last few years has overseen a huge shift in the discourse of politics from the usual trials and tribulations of democracy to what seems like a complete overhaul of everything we’re familiar with and absolutely no signs of consensus anytime soon. Some music commentators have claimed this has created a resigned attitude of pessimism decline in protest songs but the Mercury Prize shortlist shows us quite the opposite. There is no resignation in people, young and old, taking to the streets to protest the state visit of a misogynist ‘leader of the free world’ and the inaction of governments and corporations to protect the earth’s fragile ecosystems. Today’s protest culture is one that is spreading and consequently appreciates and recognises the artists who are using their platforms to help out.

IDLES’ punk-inspired album Joy as an Act of Resistance takes on attitudes towards toxic masculinity, societal pressures and immigration. Their song Danny Nedelko seeks to explain and challenge these, “Fear leads to panic, panic leads to pain, pain leads to anger, anger leads to hate.” Whilst sections of Slowthai’s album Nothing Great about Britain is reminiscent of the anti-establishmentarianism of the 1970s as he ends the titular song with the words “I will treat you with the utmost respect only if you respect me a little bit Elizabeth,” before cursing the Queen.

The severity of current political issues is creating a new wave of music as an act of resistance and the only explanation of their recent success is that they contain messages that a growing number of people relate to. Greta Thunberg’s Fridays for Climate strikes, for example, have gained a huge following so it is not surprising that pop artists such as The 1975 and Billie Eilish are referencing the climate crisis and threat of environmental degradation. Music comes from passion, whether this be a positive or negative take, and the fact that artists are being credited for their politicised statements through their music surely means these issues are more serious now than we have seen in the last few decades.

Header Image by Pooneh Ghana

Is Ageism Still a Problem in the Film Industry?

With the release of the most recent Bond film title: No Time To Die, I thought it’d be a good idea to take a look at the recent fear of ageism in the film industry. Given the franchise’s history of casting older men in the leading role and the infamous young attractive Bond girl (Honey Ryder and Pussy Galore are probably the most comical ones that come to mind), there is an obvious preference towards older men staying in roles over women who can just be replaced each time by another younger actress. Roger Moore, portrayed Bond into what one could argue was far too old an age for an action star. This isn’t just an issue confined to the Bond franchise. In recent years, prominent young actresses such as Anne Hathaway, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Zoe Saldana have all condemned high up executives for enabling ageism. 

So what exactly is the issue nowadays in Hollywood? It appears older male roles are abundant with ageing stars such as Clint Eastwood and Robert De Niro never short of a job in Hollywood. Most recently De Niro appears to reprise his role as the King of Comedy in Joker and Clint Eastwood has starred in a whole host of films. It also appears that Hollywood has no shortage of jobs for stars from the 80s as well, remaking both Terminator and Indiana Jones films with their male stars securing substantial paychecks. Even Marlon Brando was able to breathe new life into his career in Apocalypse Now (a great film by the way) despite being overweight and in need of a few dimly lit shots.

Most recently, Kelly McGillis was left out of the ‘Top Gun: Maverick’ sequel despite Tom Cruise returning for his role. Yet again, Tom Cruise has been paired with different young female co-star continually proving that Mission Impossible films often lack a recurring female star except for Michelle Monaghan who plays Julia, Ethan Hunt’s wife. In 2010, Helen Mirren’s made a comment explaining that she resented having “witnessed… the survival of some very mediocre male actors and the professional demise of some very brilliant female ones”, a tale that still resonates with many of the high up decisions made in Hollywood today.

Despite this, there have been a few recent box office successes which have appeared to revitalise the film industry’s interest in casting older female stars in leading roles. The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel grossed $130 million worldwide upon its release and starred Judi Dench and Maggie Smith, both 77 at the time. 2017 also saw Glenn Close in her early 70s shine as another great example of success when nominated for Best Actress at the Oscars for her role as Joan Castleman. When the opportunities are presented to women over a certain age (which is not often enough), they are clearly ready to take them and excel. A counterpoint to this argument could be the frequent use of de-ageing technology in films to manipulate the appearance of male actors. When you take one look at Patrick Stewart in X-Men: The Last Stand, it makes you shudder. With CGI de-ageing technology being used and sometimes abused since 2006, it appears that Hollywood has yet another weapon to eliminate old age, while casting aside perfectly suited actors in the process, and continues to pursue its search for the fountain of youth in the ever-increasingly digitised age of cinema.

Image Credit: LA Times

Gendered Award Categories: Outdated or Unrepresentative?

Anushka Searle writes in response to the announcement that the “Brit Awards ‘will review’ male and female categories”

The Brit award categories ‘British female solo artist’ and ‘British male solo artist’ appear outdated, as they reference the sex of the individual consequently isolating protentional nominees of other gender identities. In the light of Sam Smith’s recent announcement, that they identify as non-binary, it seems that award categories will need to adjust accordingly. Though, an issue arises when we consider how this could affect another minority representation. If the categories (mentioned above) were combined to form the non-gendered category ‘British solo artist’, would this mean that fewer individuals are nominated, leading to many minority groups being underrepresented? One must consider that we don’t live in an ideal world and that the music industry, and the media in general, are polluted with racism, sexism, and homophobia. Therefore, the solution cannot be to decrease the representation of some to increase the representation of others. Award shows must adjust to modern identity, however, everyone must be equally represented and purely judged on their talent. Most artists, especially smaller artists, are overjoyed just to be nominated. Therefore, we can’t decrease the nominees of two categories into just one, as smaller, struggling artists will be overshadowed.

Even though eradicating gendered categories does seem to be the best solution to include those of every gender identity, as a woman I find all female categories empowering. It’s exciting to simply focus on female creatives, and to allow them the opportunity to not be overshadowed, and to win purely on talent. Though it was empowering to witness Emma Watson become the first recipient of the MTV Movie and Television Awards’ category ‘Best movie performance’-as it has recently become gender neutral- I can’t help but be sceptical. If they had given the award to a male actor after changing the category to be gender neutral then there would have been outrage in the media, however, because it was awarded to a woman the MTV Awards were applauded. This suggests in my view that award shows are tampered with in order to be politically correct, whether there is a “public” vote or not. Combined categories therefore seem more iniquitous than separate gendered categories.

In the past, gendered award categories have been targeted as being ‘archaic and unnecessary’. However, “non-binary” is new terminology that has just begun to enter vernacular and therefore, it is unfair to use the word ‘archaic’, as the world has only just begun to understand what non-binary entails. It is also unfair to suggest that gendered categories are ‘unnecessary’, when in fact they have been necessary in order to increase the representation and support of female creatives. In conclusion, award shows need to be more representative of everybody. However, one must make sure that equality is always considered, and that changes made to represent one social group don’t diminish another grouping in the process.

Header image credit: Pink News